EGN site hacked

Well now.. the past internet site for the Ecclesia Gnostica Norvegia (http://www.handtomouth.net/EGN) has been

officially taken over… by some uintelligent lifeform, and we all will have to redirect and so forth. I wish I could extract just enough info to at least make whatever ISP`s providing services for this kind of people aware of whats going on. I don`t believe they can do other damage than make life a bit troublesome for amateur webpage makers.. perhaps they have taken over ActiveISP, havent checked it out..

It`s just sad…

Anyways the correct addy will be www.ecclesiagnostica.org

OK?

Books im reading…8

Having finished Umberto Eco`s excellent Baudolino, I began reading Paul Auster`s most recent novel, The Book of Illusions….It was a most pleasant surprise, Paul Auster has become established as a storyteller of brilliance..the tabloids have been full of praise..I was becoming suspicious, was this “hype”. I have to admit I waited to pick up this book until it had hit the paperback format….

David Zimmer, Professor of Litterature at Vermont College, age 39, enters into the most deciding crisis of his life. His anchor of identity and confidence, belief is unrooted as his family plummets down from the sky in a planecrash. Only memories, too confounding and painful, remains… by a coincidence, he discovers the work of Hector Mann, a struggling late 1920`s silent movie director/actor – and the comic and dramatic universe of his films. As a work of consolation and obsession, Zimmer begins to track down the director`s lost movies and writes a book about them….a decision not without consequences.

The book has style, a well defined personae dramatis and the eloquence and timing that Paul Auster is famous for.. It gave back a lot for the little time and effort I invested in reading it.

New Book on Gnostic Themes..

The Gospel of Mary of Magdala: Jesus and the First Woman Apostle

by Karen L. King

Karen L.King, Professor of Ecclesiastical History at Harvard Divinity School – have contributed in the field of Gnostic studies especially as it pertains to the role of women, feminity and gender symbolism with her – Images of the Feminine in Gnosticism . It is only natural that, following the “lead” of Jean-Yves LeLoup`s The Gospel of Mary Magdalene , she takes on this cryptic writing from the earliest Gnostic Christian traditions. You can find one of the earlier translations of the Gospel of Mary in the Gnostic Society Virtual Library… Anyways, Im sure I will pick up both her new book, which is the most recent – and Jean Yves LeLoup`s, which is in the bookshelf at the Bruchion Centre (our Chapel).

ramblings on 11/19

At a significant stage in my life, I quite believe I had the perspective that this life is so arbitrary that it has no interior value. My experiences coincided with what were popularly being interpreted of the Cathar Gospel “Hell is not some other place, some other time ; Hell is the world now! “.

In my poetic ramblings at that time I used to call existence in the world a sickness tiring out the intellect, draining out the last resides

of soul. Today, if I turn on the radio, at some time in the day, Black Eyed Peas “Where is the Love?” will inevitably be playing…not thats a nice song full of hopeful desperation, perhaps more in keeping with our times – when I awoke with these visions of the world, a dark harrowed place, at least Norwegian culture were divided into two camps completely disinterested in eachother and working at cross purpouses – lets say I thought of myself as participant in “the other camp” – listened to Punk Rock, read anarchist classics, joined angry demonstrations against the “establishment” – all the while thinking

no justice could ever grace the “world” and only luck and coincidence would ever secure anything of the kind for myself.

I agreed with the catchphrase at the beginning of “Bullet with Butterfly wings” by Smashing Pumpkins:

The world is a vampire!. The topic, which is insiduous in “post-modern” culture – I only have to say the word “Matrix” and only the most detached and uninterested “initiate”, that is to say, viewer of that

cinematic experience, will not get what I mean.
Im wondering if more people, especially the young and impressionable, while keeping it a secret, wakes up with a scream, in a cold sweat, all tangled up in their bedsheets… drawing back the curtains, not to be entirely comforted… I was, but perhaps it was because I had an “overactive imagination”, perhaps also, if you are twelve in 1984 you are destined to have your ears propped full of dystopian rants and the screeching moral anxiety of a generation that did not push over the “Status

Quo”, but joined it, the 68`ers, now in their late 30`s and with a serious ideological hangover..

Now our culture has elevated shallowness,superficiality,so-called irony and decadence to the position equal to any

other behaviour and expression of our humanity and our civilization

Jim Jones was nothing, if not an idealist. Now youre worried I am going to glorify the man and what he did – or made others do. But, while I suppose you shouldnt care, wouldnt care – the story told by the

tabloids arent exactly true, a lot of generalizations and ignorant banter doubtless is justified when speaking of infamy which is undisputeable. Let`s say that someone as supposedly detached as Jim Jones and the Peoples Temple thought of themselves as, spoke of themselves as – the Pastor,

or rather “father”, the Patriarch -would never allow what happened to begin to happen, it was a process and thats what scares all of us well-established,sane,analytical brainboxes looking at the photos circulating

today. I wouldnt have mentioned it in my blog if it hadnt been for the disgraceful way a tragedy is being dragged in front of us because someone thinks it is interesting to give whatever he dislikes a kick. I dislike Media as the animal it is, I despise it – not individual papers, not individual television companies, not the radios, the corporate tabloid mill, the commercial and private Internet.. but what, bunched up like a fist, the Media is, in the experience of one soul. I watched the Gulf War with the infrared, night-goggled

vision of an “innocent assassin”, some young man, like the pilots of Enola Gay, just flicking a switch, following orders… 30 years after Stanley Kubrick`s Doctor Strangelove!…If I resented, felt strongly against,

despised,loathed, wished the demise of one Iraqi president, and partied with the ranting lunatic in Washington – I could subsconsciously slip my hand in, and support the killing hand.. so easy, like a computer game, like

pretending -like crashing toy tanks against eachother in the sandbox.
There`s no doubt in my mind that the right temperature for ignition, as far as the massacre at Waco,Texas – were supplied by the national Media,

the Media of course, is innocent by definition – even propganda does not draw the killing blade against people, it puts images in front of the eyes, and voices inside the heads – that does these terrible things.

Im saying these things because these brown eyes saw the world, when the curtains were drawn apart and

daylight could come in – when the demigod in the livingroom, whether radio or television doesnt matter – droned on, when the inkblots of newspaper headlines could be visible.. much in the same manner as Jim Jones did. The world werent significantly different in terms of Zeitgeist, we lived in the same century,

the west were the west, when I think of it, despite a suspiciously communist friendly regime plodded along and created good little socialist citizens in Norway – it was much the same as some suburbian Texas or California or wherever at that time.. I am not sure how it is with everyone else, but I am desperately trying not to become a product of my own envoirment – in my view you have lost everything if you allow that to happen, as a sociologist concession to the fact of criminal behaviour, perhaps its barely workable, but only the most defeated will resort to it on their own behalf. From what I see from the CIA tapes and other materials published in the wake of what ensued, which actually originated either from Jim Jones himself or from Jonestown – there are quite in evidence that he and the whole demographic he associated and which drew his audience, his supporters, his family – were worried about what would happen if a war broke out which no one could stop, which would keep on escalating, he was worrying what would become of humanity, of the children – of our world, if a nuclear war was unleashed between the two superpowers.
Jim Jones was “unamerican”, he was not an ordinary patriot, and with regard to fundamentalism, if you bother to read up about what it is, and consider that we are dealing here with Christian theology, you`ll see he was not a fundamentalist – I am saying this because he said he believed that America would drop the bomb on communist China or Soviet because America

could and would profit, probably just briefly, from the carnage; which is a political statement, his symphaties for the prophesied victims of such an action did not make things better. He quit talking about the Bible, God and Jesus

– he went over the top and out of some strange whim began to speak about Principles and Divine Socialism, of how real justice, real freedom and real salvation only could be the product of people`s efforts and hard work…

This is what his moral supporters in the 1960`s heard, this was what he was saying – while not as extreme at the time, and in a proper evangelical christian vocabulary, at the very beginning of the congregation which became

the Peoples Temple. People denigrated and pestered over their early symphathy for Jim Jones included Martin Luther King Jr., none of them would ever agree with the extremist, radicalist, defeatist action done on

the “White day” (they planned a “white” or “dark” – lik Elijah Mohammed, Malcolm X`s former guru, Jones thought that the english language and its definitions attaching to “black” and “white” were racist and furthered

racist thinking, as a measure against this he shared his enthused conviction that God was Black, probably also a Woman, when you think about it – or why just one woman or one man… and so forth) – that day was about how a dream

had died in one person,upon whom “everyone” relied and who the collective would not allow to be questioned, Jim Jones, as we perhaps say it in the vernacular, had gone over the top and become insane, mad, crazy..

as a consequence of the extreme violence, not merely physical – but psychological, unfortunately, the Media has had to make a cartoon character out of him, and by consequence, his victims.. the Media does not allow

these to have choices, invidiuals lives, personalities… and the priorities necessary. Media exaggerates the power of influence of one person to vindicate the “innocent”, which is any body laying around dead when the

smoke has settled..

All over the world a very little body of human beings will have remembered the horror, the violation which this “white day” of November 19th 1978 in Jonestown represented. To the immediate family (913 chiefly Americans died) and survivors of this “utopian” “socialist”

“experiment” in the jungles of French Guyana it is still a heavy day, a difficult day, a day unreconciled.

Apropos – you can find A brief CNN interview with Laura Johnston Kohl, Jonestown survivor –

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/US/West/11/17/cnna.kohl/index.html

On the occasion of the 25 years of attempted healing after “event Jonestown” – when media pissed all over itself as if there hadnt been a World War 1, World War 2, Holocaust, Hiroshima Bomb, Stalag death camps, Vietnam, Cambodia and so forth…

More on Umberto Eco`s Baudolino

This really should be under a miscellaneous header..but it`s okay.

Yesterday I finished reading Umberto Eco`s new novel Baudolino.

I am very satisfied, it was well worth the time and effort – while I suspect quite a few of us will be surprised reading the book through a second time, as certainly were the case with his epic The Name of the Rose – when details, subplots,symbols,characters,coincidences will begin to form new coherent patterns – it read like a “tall tale” , a tradition Eco does homage in his story of young Baudolino`s coincidential entry into capital letter “H” – History…
From a squalid,poor background as the surviving son of his farming parents in rural Fraschetta – his qualities as a fantast, a “liar” with qualities of imagination and fervour unparalleled by your common con-artists, impresses a passing red-haired, red-bearded German Knight, who just happens to be Frederick the IInd, nicknamed “Barbarossa” (red-beard) – thus Baudolino became the adopted son of what would become the first Holy Roman Emperor. Eco has Baudolino following on the campaigns of his “father”, and have him studying in Paris, and introducing the idea of intellectual freedom and self-sovereignty in the universities(?).. whiling the time as students would, only a fraction of daylight spent in the intense quest for erudition – Baudolino plots for the advantage of his father, Frederick II. This is where the story speeds up and grows… Byzantine.. in intrigues..

While not desiring to give any more away.. there are some ingredients which perhaps isnt too obvious from the blurbs and reviews, but which are quite interesting to the type of people I associate and correspond with.. these are, in no particular order: Continue reading

Done that…went to see CATS…

Me and my gal got handed two tickets 5pm for a 8pm performance in the city of the (in)famous Musical Cats…”Do you want to go?” my father asked. Me and my girlfriend bandied around a bit, but do you know.. we went, and I suppose I shouldn`t say anything about it, but it was good. What did we expect except a few cheesy, but catchy tunes.. and entertainment all-around and a tiny bit over-the-top? That`s precisely what we got. So I have condescended into accepting an invitation into the glorious world of pop culture once again… usually such endeavours comes out of my own pocket, so those times are remarkably few.. OK: The dancing were breath-taking,the costumes looked good, the songs were ..catchy.. That`s all youre going to get me to admit, OK?

Saint Evagrius Ponticus and his Kephalaia Gnostica

During my studies I have constantly come across reference to the Origenists, usually in a hushed down manner – as if the scholars really are divided whether they should tell us more. Usually they do not go into much detail, they could tell me that St.Jerome, a name which has quite an authority and grandeur attached to it, and more significantly St.Gregory of Nyssa later in their lives changed opinions of Origen and considered many of his doctrines dangerous and heretical. This information has been duplicated so many times that it is impossible to discover the nature of their relationships with Origen as well as with his teachings. A more recent moderation of the critique against Origen suggest that the Churchfather were orthodox. The criteria for this were that the “Origenists” edited his writings and while doing so contributed their own heretical views in the name of Origen. I`d say the jury is out on that verdict, but the views in question are quite fascinating for modern Gnostics to read and consider.
But alas, one of the Origenists, although seldom mentioned in that context, were Evagrius of Pontus, like his spiritual inspirer, Origen, he was a late luminary of Christian theology who also devoted most of his attention towards the practical approach towards theosis. Evagrius of Pontus lived between 345CE and 399CE, in Ibora, a modest city in Pontus, the same coastal area in Asia Minor from which Marcion two centuries earlier went to Rome and proclamated his teachings, coincidentally, the father of both were a Bishop. It was also from this area another great of the orthodox theologians, St.Basil of Caesaria, came from. Evagrius was appointed and ordained to Lector in the church, by the elderly St.Basil, it is not known precisely when, but between 370 when he was consecrated Bishop, and 379 when he died, is quite realistic.
It is also likely that it was St.Basil that introduced Evagrius to the teachings of the great Alexandrian theologian Origen, who was a very great influence on several of the fathers, who, even after several posthumous excommunications, anathemas and controversial verdicts, remained faithful in their defense of their spiritual inspirer, some would even say, master. At this time it is also not unlikely he became acquianted with Gregory of Nazianz.
Unlike the Cappadochian fathers, who moderated Origens teachings with a great dose of Nicene Orthodoxy which the great master himself had been fortunate to antedate by a significant century, Evagrius became a radical exponent of certain teachings which concerns the full consequence and thrust of Origen`s teachings concerning the Soul and its inclination towards the light, complicated not only by the compulsions towards the carnal pleasures and comfort,but also towards what I would call Archontic arrogance. While intelligent of the supernal and immortal things, and emerging with a vision of Truth, some beings, incarnate as well as unincarnate (in the sense of being spiritual beings, angels, intelligences.. archons) – could be moved by compulsions as well, such compulsions which is more dangerous and detrimental to a full developement (another Origenist doctrine) of their spiritual potentional, among these we find hatred,envy,greed for authority/influence and the inability to feel compassion for other beings in a less favorable predicament. Could it be that, apart from scriptural foundations, such as can be found in St.Paul`s letter to the Corinthians, concerning the “authorities in higher places” persecuting the disciples of Christ rather than the flesh – this doctrine emerges from a long journey into the troubled landscape.. of the Church in the fourth century?
When St.Basil his beloved mentor died, Evagrius went for solace and further instruction to the then thriving Constantinople, a newborn city of the new empire. There he were eventually consecrated Deacon by his friend in the Alexandrine orthodox Gnosis, Gregory the Theologian (also known as Nazianzen)- of whom he writes in his Epistula Fidei:
Who is to be my Laban, setting me free from Esau,
and leading me to the supreme philosophy?
By God’s help, I have, so far as in me lies,
attained my object. I have found a chosen vessel;
a deep well. I mean Gregory [of Nazianzus]: Christ’s mouth.

A letter which is styled against what he experienced as the threat of Arianism and other directions of his day, which he felt introduced alien and dangerous teachings concerning the nature of the Christ, the Father, and the Holy Spirit – the Trinity which were a central mystery for the emerging orthodox church tradition.
Later, St.Gregory of Nazinzus were forced to vacate Constantinople and his role as Bishop – he bid Evagrius to serve as Deacon under his successor, Nectarius, which, since he was told, Evagrius did.
Like St.Basil and St.Gregory had been mentors to Evagrius, now he found himself to serve as mentor for the new Bishop of the great city. As a consequence, Evagrius human side, as it often is wont to do, made a bid for his attention, and he became amorous with the wife of a Roman prefect in the city.
Soon after he had to flee for his life, as the womans husband planned to have him killed. Warned in a dream of this possibility and also of the error of his ways, Evagrius fled in the dead of night and ended up in the double monastery founded by Rufinus and Melania the Elder, at the Mount of Olives, Jerusalem, finding his sanctuary in the monastic community of two other Origenists. From the time of his flight, his psychological constitution became troubled, suffering several nervous breakdowns and growing frail, eventually he broke out in a burning fever. Melania the Elder suspected this sickness did not have an ordinary cause and eventually got Evagrius to confess his transgressions in Constantinople, advicing him that the only way he may clense himself were to give over his life completely to God, and become a Monk.
Rufinus gave him the habit of monkhood in 383. In addition to becoming acquainted with the discipline of ascesis, Evagrius were made more acquianted with the works of Origen, Rufinus being somewhat less guarded about his teachings than his Cappadochian mentors. Evagrius now set out for the deserts of Egypt, and sat for the rest of his life at the feet of two of the greatest Origenist teachers: Macarius the Great and Didymus the Blind in the monastic settlement at Nitria, in the Egyptian desert.
Evagrius had an enormous capacity to discern spirits, and was an excellent “psychotherapist”. While a desert abba (father), Evagrius became the spiritual master of several greats,including the Tall brethren: Ammonius,Euthymius,Dioscorus and Eusebius, as well as Bishop Palladius, and John Cassian, the chronicler of the Egyptian desert fathers.
These, along with Evagrius, became very famous both for their deep knowledge of divine things and certain abilities ascribed to their persons – and the archbishops of Alexandria, among them Theophilus of Alexandria, wanted to conscript them to the offices of clergy, therefore several times Evagrius had to flee, perhaps due to having experience as Deacon in the Church under Bishop`s Gregory of Nazianzen and Nectarius, earlier in life – and also wielding a significant command of the theological and political issues which troubled Alexandria at that time. The fact of his fleeing could be construed to be profe positive he had mended his ways and were approaching things from the other end of the spectrum. A similar story, but now concerning the archbishops of Edessa, unveils in the just as dramatic life of Synesius, one of the greater exponents of the hellenistic synthesis of the Christian faith with Neo-Platonism. At one time Evagrius had to flee Egypt, and ended up in Palestine, modern biographers speculate whether he graced his old friends, Rufinus and Melania the Elder with a visit, staying at their monastery at the Mount of Olives.
At which time Evagrius wrote an apologetic letter to Theophilus, explaining why he would not again take up duty as cleric in the Church. Some commentators on Evagrius speculate upon the fact that with Evagrius, as with most of the desert fathers and early monastics, significantly little detail, if any, is given of the sacraments of the Church, and some are even moved to say that he had discovered he was better off without it. My own impression, from reading such books as Chorbishop Seely J. Beggiani`s Introduction to Eastern Christian Spirituality: The Syriac Tradition, which I recommend especially – is that they significantly misunderstand or are uninformed about the nature of the pre-mendicant Monastic movement: indeed some would not have access to the sacraments or even churches for years on end, but it would be part of their spirituality nevertheless, they were not attempting to better the Church, they were attempting to, from their interior, achieve such light, such vision and such healing that would allow them to inspire the Church. That was precisely the motivation for Evagrius to write his great works, among which the 6 centuries of his Kephalia Gnostica can be counted.
Evagrius writes (from Fr.Luke Dysinger`s translation, Introduction to Kephalia Gnostica, the Gnostikos) :
13. It is proper for the knower to speak to monks and seculars concerning a proper way of life, as well as to explain in part doctrines concerning physike and theologike “without which no one will see the Lord.” (Heb 12:14)
while:
14. To priests alone, [and only] to those who are among the best,reply if they question you what is symbolized by the mysteries they perform and which purify the interior man: the vessels which they receive designate the passionate part of the soul and the rational part; on what is the inseperable mixture, the power of each of them, and the accomplishing of the activities of each in view of a single purpose. And tell them again of what is the symbol of that which accomplishes them, and who those are that, with them repel those that establish an obstacle to pure conduct, and who, among the living beings some have the memory and some do not have it.
On the abstract treatment of deity:
27. Do not, without [careful] consideration, speak about God [in Himself]; nor should you ever define the Deity: for it is only of {things which are made or} are composite that there can be definitions.
Which is part of Ibn al-Arabi`s advice to his readers as well, indeed Evagrius appears to have the same agenda, if it is possible – let each assume an attitude which is conductive to understanding in a gentle manner.

However, modern systematic theologians would well profit from this advice of Evagrius:
34. You must not interpret spiritually everything that lends itself to allegory, but rather only that which is fiting to the subject; because if you do not act thus, you pass much time on Jonas’ boat, explaining every part of its equipment. And you will be humerous to your listeners, rather than useful to them: all of these sitting around you will remind you of this or that equipment, and by laughing [they] will remind you of what you have forgotten.

Evagrius of Pontus had during his years as a monk, and some would say, penitent – adapted for himself a very strict and severe asceticism which gradually reduced him physically. In the year he died, in 399CE, he had graced this earth his visit for a meagre 54 years. Just a few years afterwards the controversy around the chief inspirer of his tradition, Origen, grew intense and an likewise intense persecution, forcing his brethren in the Alexandrine orthodox Gnosis into diaspora/exile in the Egyptian desert.

The spiritual classic known as “The Philokalia” still contains several of his works today, and is much used in Eastern Orthodoxy still.
Evagrius, who is considered a Saint in several traditions of the Eastern Churches, has his feastday on February 11.

Fr.Luke Dysinger`s biography for Evagrius of Pontus, from his excellent homepage.

I also found these useful
Evagrius Ponticus: Monastic Theologian, online resources.
The Coptic Life of Evagrius, translated by Tim Vivian
Cure of the Distressed Soul: the Consolation of Evagrius of Pontus on the Death of Gregory Nazianzus, by Joel Kalvesmaki, at the Evagrius website.
Created and Renewed after the image of God: About the biblical-theological and sacramental Foundations of Evagrian Mysticism,
by Fr.Gabriel Bunge,OSB.

On the life and activity of Evagrius of Pontus at the Truth of Orthodoxy page on Origen and Origenism (it is actually quite symphatetic)

Books im reading..7

I am currently having Umberto Eco`s most recent novel, Baudolino, as company on my bus trips to work… I really loved The Name of the Rose

and The Island from the Day Before, and feel I am getting much the same fare now , and I am not complaining. Baudolino`s exploits as the adopted son of Emperor Frederick Barbarossa have fascinated me and held me in thrall for almost a week now. I read the book when I have my hands free and can spare some time, I am sure I would have read it from start to finish in one go if my life had been as vacant as it was when I discovered Eco through his brilliant novel The Name of the Rose. Being fascinated with the myths,folklore,poetry,legends,religious mysticism,occult and metaphysical speculations,art and architecture of the middle ages..and reading a lot of more or less entertaining scholarly works on the history and nature of that time period – I feel that with Baudolino that world, which has been, and which, phantastically still is – comes even more alive. The style of Baudolino is that of long narrations interjected with banter between the storyteller, Baudolino himself and his Byzantine scribe, Nicetas Choniates..Constantinople is burning, the latin crusaders have entered the holy imperial city with orders to humiliate and devastate the Byzantine empire as much as possible. With this as backdrop, Baudolino begins telling his story, which spans from his childhood in the “hicks” to his assassination of whom he claims is the murderer of emperor Frederick, his fosterfather.

As far as I have come into the book now, about 1/3 – I warmly recommend it.